This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 157008 - Require PHP PEAR support by default
Summary: Require PHP PEAR support by default
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: php
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker with 1 vote (vote)
Assignee: issues@php
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-18 15:39 UTC by hantsy
Modified: 2010-09-17 05:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
process (103.51 KB, image/png)
2009-11-25 04:55 UTC, hantsy 		Details
cpu (87.12 KB, image/png)
2009-11-25 04:55 UTC, hantsy 		Details
Show Obsolete (2) Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description hantsy 2009-01-18 15:39:56 UTC 
PEAR(http://pear.php.net) is php official lib management tool, it is like ruby gems, java maven. Why not support it by
default for PHP support.
Some features are required.
1.Implement packaging php project as PEAR package.
2.Provide a "PEAR" manager like "Ruby Gems" manager to install PHP library from remote server. 
3.Create index on the installed PHP library, and provide "Code completion" feature to fix dependency problem in php project.
Comment 1 hantsy 2009-11-25 04:55:21 UTC 
Created attachment 91659 [details]
process
Comment 2 hantsy 2009-11-25 04:55:56 UTC 
Created attachment 91660 [details]
cpu
Comment 3 Tomas Mysik 2009-11-25 08:15:12 UTC 
Regarding to your 2 attachments - incorrect issue? Or please explain what we should do with them.

Thanks.
Comment 4 hantsy 2009-11-25 11:20:25 UTC 
Please delete them, they are related with another bug I submitted.
The moment I submitted them, the network maybe encountered some problem, I refresh the page but I did not noticed the issue content was changed(I do not know weather itself is a bug).
I am very sorry.
Comment 5 Filip Zamboj 2010-09-15 12:36:28 UTC 
batch reassigning