This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 13959 - Source Editor not refreshing to show merge conflicts
Summary: Source Editor not refreshing to show merge conflicts
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 13017
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: vcscvs (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Windows ME/2000
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@obsolete
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2001-07-26 11:07 UTC by John Jullion-ceccarelli
Modified: 2001-09-04 13:56 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description John Jullion-ceccarelli 2001-07-26 11:07:45 UTC
Hi,

I was playing around with a local CVS repository I set up using the IDE, trying 
to see how the IDE deals with merge conflicts. Specifically I created a file, 
made several changes to the file and committed each one as a new revision, then 
updated to an earlier revision, altered it in a way I  knew would cause a merge 
conflict and tried to update.

The Output Window displayed "cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!" 
as expected but the Source Editor did not refresh, thus the code that was 
causing the merge conflict wasn't bracketed with <<<<<<< >>>>>>> and the user 
doesn't know what's causing the conflict. If you close the Source Editor and 
open it again, however, the <<<<<<< >>>>>>> are displayed. Any way to have the 
Source Editor update when it runs into a merge conlfict?

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

John Jullion-Ceccarelli
Comment 1 Jiri Kovalsky 2001-07-26 12:22:15 UTC
This is actually a duplicate of another issue that is now being repor-
ted perhaps from whole the world. :-) I believe it's not CVS issue but
editor's one.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 13017 ***
Comment 2 dmladek 2001-09-04 13:56:35 UTC
hmmm...duplicated (no more comments:)