This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 132437 - AssertionError at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutInterval.getCurrentSpace
Summary: AssertionError at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutInterval.getCu...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 91892
Alias: None
Product: guibuilder
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Natural Layout (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@guibuilder
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-09 17:05 UTC by Tomas Mysik
Modified: 2008-05-28 16:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 45210

Attachments
stacktrace (3.00 KB, text/plain)
2008-04-09 17:05 UTC, Tomas Mysik 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tomas Mysik 2008-04-09 17:05:16 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200804062002)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM, 10.0-b19, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_05-b13
OS: Linux, 2.6.24-gentoo-r4, i386

User Comments: 
Still trying do align list to the side with the default border.
The form can be found as attachment of issue #70661.
Comment 1 Tomas Mysik 2008-04-09 17:05:22 UTC 
Created attachment 59918 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Jana Maleckova 2008-04-09 18:43:36 UTC 
StackTrace:
===========
java.lang.AssertionError
        at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutInterval.getCurrentSpace(LayoutInterval.java:491)
        at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutAligner.getPosition(LayoutAligner.java:510)
        at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutAligner.splitByAlignAttrs(LayoutAligner.java:311)
        at org.netbeans.modules.form.layoutdesign.LayoutAligner.splitByAlignAttrs(LayoutAligner.java:208)
Comment 3 Jan Stola 2008-05-28 16:38:57 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 91892 ***