This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 118533 - [60cat] Customizing install packs
Summary: [60cat] Customizing install packs
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: installer
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC All
: P3 blocker with 2 votes (vote)
Assignee: Libor Fischmeistr
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-11 12:15 UTC by ulfzibis
Modified: 2014-02-10 14:14 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ulfzibis 2007-10-11 12:15:38 UTC
[ JDK VERSION : 1.6.0_02 ]

First I don't understand, why you provide those mutiple packs on the
download page, as you never can satify all differing wishes, and
because all modules can be plugged in later by the Update Center
(hopefully also the Runtimes).

What you think about this:
======================
1.) Provide these Packs on NetBeans download page:
- JavaSE
- Ruby
- C++
- All Inclusive

2.) Add a _selectable_ list of all possible modules below.
If the user has selected some additional modules, they should be
downloaded as seperate files to the same destination folder at the
same time after hitting the "Download" button.

3.) And then at the end of the basic install procedure or at first
start (before import settings question), the user should be prompted
by a dialog to selectable post-install the additional modules.
Comment 1 _ wadechandler 2007-10-11 14:30:32 UTC
How exactly do you propose all files be downloaded at the same time to the users directory from the web browser? Should
they be prompted to save every single file? Web applications have limitations on files etc and can not save directly to
disk. I think the best approach is the one used. The other approach could be to bring packs back and let users download
them, but then why do we want the packs? You can make your own installers for different type IDEs such as Ruby only
support, so I'm curious what the exact use case would be (the steps you will use with these packs...single or multiple
computers...will you just end up installing the same packs you download to all your computers?). 

Anyways, I think a good argument for the use cases and a good versus argument is needed to make any kind of a decision
here as to why one way would be better than the other. If the auto-update center let users download NBMs, all selected,
to  a folder you could make your own groups of files needed for certain pack type deployments. Is this the issue with
packs? You need to deploy to multiple computers in different ways?
Comment 2 Jiri Kovalsky 2007-10-11 14:31:13 UTC
Adding Jano Rojcek (our xDesign expert) to CC: list in order to possibly get his opinion on this enhancement.
Comment 3 ulfzibis 2007-10-11 15:20:54 UTC
> Should they be prompted to save every single file?

I'm not a specialist in web-design, so if there is no other way, then let the user be prompted for every single file.
For example if someone chooses JavaSE+JavaEE+UML+Tomcat he has to "OK" four times.

The reason, I propose this is, that it should be difficult to tie customized packs on demand by your server. (See
comment from Jiri Kovalski at the NetCat mailing list)
A 2nd advantage is, that the user, who tests dailies, can easily switch between different combinations or use new daily
of the Base IDE in combination with his recent modules without to have newly to download them all.

Comment 4 Jiri Rechtacek 2012-10-07 12:58:37 UTC
Assigned to new owner.