This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 98468 - Don't list every item of library separately in Libraries view
Summary: Don't list every item of library separately in Libraries view
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Libraries (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Tomas Zezula
URL:
Keywords: USABILITY
: 104886 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks: 98459
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-03-21 13:43 UTC by Lukas Hasik
Modified: 2011-08-31 14:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Hasik 2007-03-21 13:43:20 UTC
070319

-when a library has more items in library classpath them every item is listed
separately under the Libraries node

->it could be more useful/space saving to list the items under the library node(
like in the platform case (e.g. JDK 1.6))
Comment 1 Andrei Badea 2007-03-21 16:52:15 UTC
This would really make sense. The current state, although it intended to make
the contents of the Libraries node simpler, actually causes more visual clutter
than a 1:1 mapping of libraries to nodes. Try e.g. adding to a project a few
libraries composed of many jar files, like Spring or Hibernate, and you will see.

Also, as the reporter points out, the current state is inconsistent with the JDK
node, and also with the Java EE platform node in the Java EE projects.

Tomasi, why did you move this to projects/libraries? It looks to me like an
issue in the projects types. Or do you plan to implement a support for the
Libraries node? ;-)

This deserves a higher priority IMHO, upgrading to P2.
Comment 2 Jesse Glick 2007-03-21 18:08:19 UTC
We do need a generic Libraries node, I think.
Comment 3 Tomas Zezula 2008-10-15 14:31:55 UTC
*** Issue 104886 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***