This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 97703 - Viewing result of applying a patch should not open multiple windows
Summary: Viewing result of applying a patch should not open multiple windows
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 107783
Alias: None
Product: utilities
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Diff (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: Macintosh Mac OS X
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: diff-issues@utilities
URL:
Keywords:
: 106238 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-13 05:22 UTC by headius
Modified: 2007-08-03 15:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
multiple errors (52.09 KB, image/png)
2007-03-13 05:23 UTC, headius 		Details
too many diff views (36.29 KB, image/png)
2007-03-13 05:24 UTC, headius 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description headius 2007-03-13 05:22:29 UTC 
After successfully applying a patch, NetBeans prompts to show the results. If
you select yes, and there are multiple files changed as a result of the patch, a
separate diff window is opened for each. See attached image for the result of
applying a patch that hits multiple files.

In addition, any errors that have resulted are popped up in multiple windows.

A single result window should come up to display all errors, and viewing patch
results should be shown in a single editor window.
Comment 1 headius 2007-03-13 05:23:15 UTC 
Created attachment 39412 [details]
multiple errors
Comment 2 headius 2007-03-13 05:24:02 UTC 
Created attachment 39413 [details]
too many diff views
Comment 3 Maros Sandor 2007-03-21 11:42:07 UTC 
We will think about better visualization.
Comment 4 Maros Sandor 2007-06-11 17:09:30 UTC 
*** Issue 106238 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 5 Maros Sandor 2007-08-03 15:19:03 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 107783 ***