This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Original status: 1-Dispatched; Suggested Status: NEW Original Target Release: shortfin_dev; Suggested Target Milestone : 5.5 Original submitter: sjangity Description: From email... On Thursday 21 September 2006 09:26, Sandeep Jangity wrote: > > Good point, Sakthi. > > > > Marco, can this be treated as a bug? I just think it would speed up the > > development time if the user can quit the IDE and restart it when needed > > and know that the IDE is in the same state that they left it in. Maybe...? That's an area where Creator (..., Leopard) differed from NB. NB always shutdown down the servers it starts. We for Creator thought we should keep them running. Now we have the NB behavior since we are NB. So it's not a bug, it's a feature;-) Do I agree?? Thanks, -- Marco > > > > Thanks, > > Sandeep > > > > xxx@xxxx wrote: >> > > Atleast, with Leopard it is not this way. >> > > >> > > Installer starts PE and it stays open when installer is closed and IDE >> > > is started. >> > > Starting Derby from Leopard IDE makes it stay open, until you close it. >> > > It is the same with PE in Leopard. Start PE from inside or outside of >> > > IDE, it stays running until you close it. >> > > >> > > Lark Fitzgerald wrote: >>> > >> I'm pretty sure that's right. When you start the app server from the >>> > >> ide, it is a child of the ide. Child processes get kill off when the >>> > >> parent is shut down, otherwise its considered an orphan process >>> > >> (bug). If you want your app server to stay up, you should start it >>> > >> outsided of the ide. >>> > >> >>> > >> Lark >>> > >> >>> > >> Sandeep Jangity wrote: >>>> > >>> Guys, >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> I just ran a simple r-t navigation test and had configured GF and >>>> > >>> started the app server from the Runtime tab. I closed the >>>> > >>> project/IDE. When I restarted, I noticed the App Server was stopped, >>>> > >>> as verified in the Runtime tab. Does that make sense? Or a bug? >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Thanks, >>>> > >>> Sandeep
Somebody should probably decide what to do.
Interesting idea, isn't it, Stepan? What about to ask the user whether to shut down the server or not?