This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 93883 - I18N - i18n tutorials don't have information on number/date formatting or message parameters
Summary: I18N - i18n tutorials don't have information on number/date formatting or mes...
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: obsolete
Classification: Unclassified
Component: visualweb (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: Sun Solaris
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Gail Chappell
URL:
Keywords: I18N
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-02-01 22:07 UTC by bugbridge
Modified: 2011-11-28 17:33 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bugbridge 2007-02-01 22:07:56 UTC
Description:
from customer posting
http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=361197

see reply 15 and this part:
About the tutorial :
I have only read the tutorial. I have not done it.
A missing point in this tutorial is the format of dates and numbers.
If i have a doubleConverter for a textfield, the decimal separator is always the
dot. In french, it should be the comma.
Other comments about the tutorial: I have not read how to deal with messages
with parameters.
A step by step process to explain how to change system messages is missing. 

can both of this be added to the applicalble i18n tutorial(s) ?

Description (Entry 2):
Another customer gave the tutorial a "poor" rating with this comment:

This tutorial does not explain the real difficulties for internationalization.
The system texts ( calendar componant, error messages from validators), the
decimal separator...

This is good information to add to the tutorial.

Evaluation:
The information that the customer requests will be good to add to the tutorial.
 We will add the information when we update the tutorial.
Comment 1 Jiri Prox 2007-09-17 21:39:19 UTC
Obsolete milestone, please reevaluate