This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 83863 - Resolving well-known namespaces in a customizable way
Summary: Resolving well-known namespaces in a customizable way
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: xml
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WSDL Tools (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Ritesh Adval
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-31 01:01 UTC by J Xu
Modified: 2007-03-24 01:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
discussion on this a proposed solution (29.83 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-10-23 19:27 UTC, Ritesh Adval 		Details
encoder schema (782 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2006-10-23 19:36 UTC, Ritesh Adval 		Details
file extension example of using encodingStyle attribute (10.49 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-10-23 19:38 UTC, Ritesh Adval 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description J Xu 2006-08-31 01:01:10 UTC 
XSD/WSDL models should provide a mechanism to allow resolving well-known
namespaces without schema locations defined and in a customizable way.  For
example, the main resolver can look up some service providers, which implement a
specific interface (such as WellKnownNamespaceResolver), and use these providers
to resolve well-known namespaces.
Comment 1 Ritesh Adval 2006-10-23 19:27:33 UTC 
Created attachment 35476 [details]
discussion on this a proposed solution
Comment 2 Ritesh Adval 2006-10-23 19:36:47 UTC 
Created attachment 35477 [details]
encoder schema
Comment 3 Ritesh Adval 2006-10-23 19:38:53 UTC 
Created attachment 35478 [details]
file extension example of using encodingStyle attribute
Comment 4 Shivanand Kini 2007-03-24 00:38:01 UTC 
Jun, Is this still a requirement?
Comment 5 J Xu 2007-03-24 01:31:52 UTC 
I still think so.  Not sure how other people consider it.