This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 83734 - Spurious warnings in suite Libraries panel re. deps corrected by ModuleAutoDeps
Summary: Spurious warnings in suite Libraries panel re. deps corrected by ModuleAutoDeps
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: rmichalsky
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 170056
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-08-30 02:06 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2009-12-21 20:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2006-08-30 02:06:52 UTC
If your platform contains some config/ModuleAutoDeps/*.xml which would permit
otherwise illegal interdependencies among modules in that platform, and you make
a suite containing a pair of such modules, currently you will get an error
message in the Libraries pane of the properties dialog.
org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project.ui.customizer.SuiteCustomizerLibraries.findWarning(UniverseModule,...)
should call
org.netbeans.core.startup.AutomaticDependencies.{parse,refineDependencies} to
take this into account.
Comment 1 rmichalsky 2008-11-24 15:02:41 UTC
Not into 7.0 or next release. Feel free to reopen if more important than it seems.
Comment 2 rmichalsky 2008-11-24 15:14:11 UTC
A mistake, sorry.
Comment 3 Quality Engineering 2009-12-21 05:28:24 UTC
This bug was reported against NetBeans IDE 6.0 or an older release, or against a non-maintained module. NetBeans team does not have enough resources to get to this issue, therefore we are closing the issue as a WONTFIX. If you are interested in providing a patch for this bug, please see our NetFIX guidelines for how to proceed. 

We apologize for any inconvenience.


Thank you.
The NetBeans Team
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2009-12-21 20:32:57 UTC
This is probably still valid but I can no longer remember what the test case is.