This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 82603 - Profiling fails: Could not find agent library in absolute path
Summary: Profiling fails: Could not find agent library in absolute path
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 72941
Alias: None
Product: profiler
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@profiler
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-14 12:52 UTC by Tomas Danek
Modified: 2006-10-23 15:47 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
verbose ant output (614.45 KB, text/plain)
2006-08-14 12:53 UTC, Tomas Danek
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tomas Danek 2006-08-14 12:52:27 UTC
NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200608131800)
1.6.0-rc; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.6.0-rc-b94
Windows XP version 5.1 running on x86
en_US (nb); Cp1252

-------------------
1) I have unzipped ide into C:\Sw\netbeans 6.0\netbeans\
2) installed trunk profiler into this dir (using installer)
3) created new Paintapp sample (samples|netbeans plug-in modules)
4) invoked Profile project on Paint application suite
5) choose "analyze performance", entire application
6) connecting to target VM fails. Verbose output is attached

problem is: Could not find agent library in absolute path: C:/Sw/netbeans.
(-J-agentpath:C:/Sw/netbeans). This directory exists, but it contains some old
build of 5.0, of course without profiler.
Comment 1 Tomas Danek 2006-08-14 12:53:34 UTC
Created attachment 32878 [details]
verbose ant output
Comment 2 Jiri Sedlacek 2006-08-14 13:30:55 UTC
This is an already known problem caused by space in NetBeans installation path 
(C:\Sw\netbeans 6.0\netbeans). As a workaround please install/copy NetBeans to 
a path without spaces (C:\Sw\netbeans6.0\netbeans).

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 72941 ***
Comment 3 Tomas Danek 2006-08-14 13:39:36 UTC
ok. thanks. verified dupl. && increasing priority of original - P3 is
inappropriate IMHO.