This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 80475 - Missing UI for Needs and Recommends
Summary: Missing UI for Needs and Recommends
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: apisupport
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Project (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Kozeny
URL:
Keywords: UI
Depends on: 34699
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2006-07-18 13:17 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2016-05-25 06:08 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2006-07-18 13:17:32 UTC
There is going to be no UI for using Needs and Recommends tokens after 
integration of issue 34699. It is not clear how to UI shall look like, but 
very likely there shall be some.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2006-10-30 15:28:01 UTC
Fixing Libraries panel to warn about unsatisfied OpenIDE-Module-Needs contract:

Checking in src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ManifestManager.java;
/shared/data/ccvs/repository/apisupport/project/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ManifestManager.java,v
 <--  ManifestManager.java
new revision: 1.32; previous revision: 1.31
done
Checking in
src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ui/customizer/SuiteCustomizerLibraries.java;
/shared/data/ccvs/repository/apisupport/project/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ui/customizer/SuiteCustomizerLibraries.java,v
 <--  SuiteCustomizerLibraries.java
new revision: 1.36; previous revision: 1.35
done
Checking in
test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ui/customizer/SuiteCustomizerLibrariesTest.java;
/shared/data/ccvs/repository/apisupport/project/test/unit/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ui/customizer/SuiteCustomizerLibrariesTest.java,v
 <--  SuiteCustomizerLibrariesTest.java
new revision: 1.6; previous revision: 1.5
done
Comment 2 rmichalsky 2008-09-04 09:44:37 UTC
An enhancement, together with issue #64618, after 6.5.
Comment 3 Jaroslav Tulach 2016-05-25 06:08:36 UTC
Maybe already fixed.