This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 79621 - Bad usability when input Object does not include setter/getter methods to all private fields
Summary: Bad usability when input Object does not include setter/getter methods to all...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: javame
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Web Services (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Michal Skvor
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-07-03 15:47 UTC by Lukas Hasik
Modified: 2008-05-05 13:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Hasik 2006-07-03 15:47:02 UTC 
(it was bug 6402018) 

---Decription---
A misunderstanding happens when extracted server method returns an object. The
object includes several private methods, but not all of the private fields have
setter/getter methods. The generated code uses only fields that have
setter/getter methods (same as JavaBeans). But user does not aware of it. User
does not understand why only partial set of the original fields are used in the
generated code.

We know about this problem. One of suggestions was showing "invalid" fields
using strikeout font and in tooltip show why this field is disabled. I know that
this could confuse users and it will be fixed in future versions.
--------------
Comment 1 Michal Skvor 2006-09-11 11:06:57 UTC 
Will be implemented in upcoming version.
Comment 2 Petr Dvorak 2008-05-05 13:57:35 UTC 
Hi misk!

Did you already implement this enhancement? I cannot check it myself now, but since a "Target milestone" field is set to
6.0, it was either implemented (-> issue should be closed), or the target milestone should to be revised (set to 6.5 or
to future)...

Could you please take a look at this enhancement and update it if necessary?

Thanks,

Petr Dvorak (Joshis)