This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 74646 - Add server customizer support
Summary: Add server customizer support
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Infrastructure (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Petr Hejl
URL:
Keywords: API
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-09 10:53 UTC by Sherold Dev
Modified: 2007-09-17 20:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
javadoc (410.44 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-04-09 10:57 UTC, Sherold Dev 		Details
API change diff (35.66 KB, patch)
2006-04-09 10:58 UTC, Sherold Dev 		Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sherold Dev 2006-04-09 10:53:16 UTC 
Provide an API for default implementations of some common server manager
customizer panes like classes, sources and javadoc so that we won't have to
copy-paste the same code among plugins any more.
Comment 1 Sherold Dev 2006-04-09 10:57:02 UTC 
Created attachment 29710 [details]
javadoc
Comment 2 Sherold Dev 2006-04-09 10:58:42 UTC 
Created attachment 29711 [details]
API change diff
Comment 3 Sherold Dev 2006-04-09 11:00:26 UTC 
Please review the following API change.
Comment 4 Sherold Dev 2006-04-13 17:40:25 UTC 
If there are no objections I will integrate this api change tomorrow.
Comment 5 Sherold Dev 2006-04-14 16:27:26 UTC 
After talking to Pavel, I've decided to postpone this API change.

The current proposal of the default classes customizer pane does not allow to
add new jars/libraries to the server, which we would likely want to add very
soon. At this point, it is, however, not completely clear how it should look like.

Adding this ability to the current proposal later would require an incompatible
change and therefore it seems reasonable to wait with integration until this API
includes this ability.

In the meantime plug-ins may use a temporary copy of this proposal, which will
be replaced once this issue gets fixed.
Comment 6 Jiri Prox 2007-09-17 20:30:45 UTC 
Obsolete milestone, please reevaluate