This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 71483 - I18N - Default Option for Compiler not present
Summary: I18N - Default Option for Compiler not present
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 42638
Alias: None
Product: www
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Builds & Repositories (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: nbbuild-issues@ide
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-17 11:00 UTC by gyftaki
Modified: 2006-08-21 05:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description gyftaki 2006-01-17 11:00:46 UTC
This issue is relating to the encoding settings available in netbeans. I 
usually work using the default encoding of java source files to utf-8. Which 
in turn means that I have to set the build options for each individual project 
to "-encoding utf-8". Since there is already a way to set the default encoding 
of source files, it will be very usefull to have an option to set default 
compiling and build options throughout the ide, and not on a project basis 
only. I am not talking about point and click sort of thing for each of the 
extra option available for javac, but a text field that will store the general 
compiling options I wish. If for an individual project I want these to be 
different I can change them with the features already available.

Having said that it will be also usefull that the output panel inherited the 
encoding that the source files of the project have. If that is too 
complicated, then an option will be very nice. If I get an error message for 
some string written in utf-8 that does not use roman characters then the 
output window shows giberish. 

I hope I have made the issue clear. For anything else please let me know.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2006-01-17 18:40:08 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 42638 ***
Comment 2 Ken Frank 2006-08-21 05:56:58 UTC
To bug filer - you mentioned in 42638 that this is different than that one -
could you summarize and then reopen this issue and mark it not as a duplicate ?

I modifed the summary line a bit.

ken.frank@sun.com