This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 61938 - AntProjectHelper doesn't work with JDK 6.0-ea-b46
Summary: AntProjectHelper doesn't work with JDK 6.0-ea-b46
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Ant Project (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jesse Glick
URL:
Keywords: JDK_SPECIFIC
: 62140 62520 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-08 14:38 UTC by Martin Krauskopf
Modified: 2011-06-09 09:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
DOMException (6.75 KB, text/plain)
2005-08-08 14:39 UTC, Martin Krauskopf
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Krauskopf 2005-08-08 14:38:16 UTC
linux, jdk 6.0-ea-b46

It is not possible to open NetBeans Modules with jdk-6.0-b46. It works with b44.
Not sure about b45. Probably something has changed in the recent release in DOM
implementation (xerces/JDK bug?). 
See attached DOMException.
Comment 1 Martin Krauskopf 2005-08-08 14:39:03 UTC
Created attachment 23571 [details]
DOMException
Comment 2 Martin Krauskopf 2005-08-08 14:46:30 UTC
It works fine with b45.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2005-08-08 18:52:52 UTC
Well I can certainly reproduce. Cannot make a new j2seproject, either. Something
involving namespace handling in JAXP certainly changed, though the integration
list for b46 does not mention JAXP at all! I will try to come up with a small
test case and file for the JDK team. Thanks for catching this early.
Comment 4 Jesse Glick 2005-08-09 01:06:11 UTC
Filed the bug you found.
Comment 5 Jesse Glick 2005-08-09 01:44:12 UTC
I filed #6308037 for the problem creating new projects. That part is fixable on
our side, at least, by using JAXP rather than Xerces serialization (in JDK 1.5+
only).
Comment 6 Jesse Glick 2005-08-09 02:44:18 UTC
Let them fix #6308015 in JAXP. If they cannot deliver a fix quickly, it is
probably possible to make a workaround in our code, though performance would suffer.
Comment 7 Martin Krauskopf 2005-08-11 00:14:06 UTC
*** Issue 62140 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 8 Milan Kubec 2005-08-18 08:13:04 UTC
*** Issue 62520 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
Comment 9 Marian Mirilovic 2011-06-09 09:51:34 UTC
v/c