This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 60139 - F11 does not work in Mustang b40
Summary: F11 does not work in Mustang b40
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 60104
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: -- Other -- (show other bugs)
Version: 5.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@platform
URL:
Keywords: JDK_SPECIFIC, REGRESSION
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-06-16 13:10 UTC by Jesse Glick
Modified: 2008-12-22 20:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jesse Glick 2005-06-16 13:10:38 UTC
Use a recent dev build on a fresh user dir under Linux (FC3), default Ocean L&F,
standard US-101 keyboard layout. Run with Mustang b39, create a j2seproject. F6
runs and F11 builds (and S-F11 clean builds), all as expected.

Now run with Mustang b40. F6 still runs, but F11 and S-F11 do nothing. The
corresponding menu items work fine.

Playing with the Keyboard Shortcuts dialog, I tried to bind some other action to
F11 in b40, and got a surprise: when I pressed the F11 key, the binding was
listed as "Stop", not "F11". (Pressing F12 resulted in "Again", but F10 was
"F10" as expected.)

What are "Stop" and "Again"? Looks like a bug in Mustang b40, but needs to be
investigated why this change was made. From

https://mustang.dev.java.net/files/documents/2817/15859/mustang-b40.html

all I can see is

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6266513 - key handling in
XAWT popup menu

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4360364 - Cyrillic input in Linux
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2005-06-16 13:11:36 UTC
Consider this P2 since F11 is in practice such a commonly needed KB shortcut
that its absence is very noticeable.
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2005-06-16 15:48:20 UTC
isn't this one a dup of issue 60104 ?
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2005-06-20 22:40:24 UTC
Yes.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 60104 ***
Comment 4 Tomas Danek 2005-08-01 09:10:23 UTC
verified as dupl.