This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 54739 - A lot of exceptions when I right-click on websvc node
Summary: A lot of exceptions when I right-click on websvc node
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 51872
Alias: None
Product: webservices
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Grebac
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-09 12:51 UTC by Martin Grebac
Modified: 2006-03-24 13:09 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
exceptions (22.97 KB, text/plain)
2005-02-10 12:31 UTC, Martin Grebac 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin Grebac 2005-02-09 12:51:54 UTC 
Often when I want to invoke refactoring, just a
simple right-click on websvc node gives me bunch
of exceptions (see log). 

This is a problem, because the enabled() method is
sometimes called under already locked document by
MDR, which is illegal approach.

Solution would be to change CookieAction to
NodeAction or remove the call from enable method.
Comment 1 Martin Grebac 2005-02-10 12:31:53 UTC 
Created attachment 20293 [details]
exceptions
Comment 2 _ pcw 2005-02-11 02:10:36 UTC 
Is this being caused by a poorly written action in websvc/core or is
this an MDR problem?  At a glance, the stack trace suggests the
former, but your comment suggests the latter.  Looks like a serious
issue regardless.
Comment 3 Martin Grebac 2005-02-11 08:30:36 UTC 
 It's the latter, see also issue 51872 where Jarda is trying to come
up with a fix. I'll try to check if his patch attached to the issue
helps or not.
 Also as I mentioned before, removal of MDR calls in the enable()
method would help, but I don't think there's an easy way to do it.
Comment 4 Martin Grebac 2005-02-16 11:15:20 UTC 

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 51872 ***
Comment 5 Martin Grebac 2005-03-18 12:15:38 UTC 
vd