This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 54457 - Call ws operation move code in servlet
Summary: Call ws operation move code in servlet
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: webservices
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: PC All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Grebac
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-02-03 12:18 UTC by Lukas Jungmann
Modified: 2006-03-24 13:16 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lukas Jungmann 2005-02-03 12:18:14 UTC
[build 200502021900]

- have web app with websvc client and new "empty"
servlet
- invoke Web Service Client Resources | Call Web
Service Operation in servlet, choose operation and
finish wizard

=> comment in processRequest method is moved 8
spaces right
Comment 1 _ pcw 2005-02-10 01:30:21 UTC
Cannot reproduce.  If this still exists, please provide more detail,
including what exact cursor position was used during step 2 in the
steps above.
Comment 2 Lukas Jungmann 2005-02-10 11:31:04 UTC
Yes, it's still there.

I'll try to be more specific:
1. create dummy web service with operation in EJB module and run this
module
2. create new web app
3. create new web service client for web service created in EJB module
(from running URL: http://localhost:8080/NewWebService?WSDL)
4. create new servlet
5. place cursor before "out.close()"
6. invoke Web Service Client Resources | Call Web
Service Operation in servlet, choose operation and
finish wizard

Please reopen if you can reproduce it.
Comment 3 Lukas Jungmann 2005-02-16 10:34:57 UTC
I'm able to reproduce it in 200502151900
Comment 4 _ ludo 2005-03-15 22:12:29 UTC
P4 for sure. adding 8 spaces in a comment is bad, but not a p3.
Comment 5 Martin Grebac 2005-03-25 09:42:33 UTC
I'll check if I haven't fix it already ;O)
Comment 6 Martin Grebac 2005-03-25 16:11:30 UTC
works for me, so I assume it was fixed by the jmi rewrite
Comment 7 Lukas Jungmann 2005-04-15 13:31:57 UTC
v. in 200504142205
Comment 8 Lukas Jungmann 2005-04-15 13:33:21 UTC
v.