This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 48414 - Support creation of web projects with other source structures
Summary: Support creation of web projects with other source structures
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Web Project (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Andrei Badea
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-09-02 18:07 UTC by Petr Jiricka
Modified: 2004-12-14 18:31 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petr Jiricka 2004-09-02 18:07:00 UTC
Currently, the wizard for creating a new web
project creates the project with the Jakarta
structure. It should be possible to create a web
projects with other structures, most importantly
the J2EE Blueprints structure as specified at 

http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html

This could be implemented as follows: in the Name
and  Location panel of the new Web Application
wizard, there would be a combo box called "Source
Structure:". In this combo box, the user could
choose one of the following:

Java Blueprints [selected by default]
Jakarta
Custom

If the user chooses Custom, she is presented with
an additional panel that allows her to specify doc
base, Java sources root, tests root (when we
support tests) etc.
Comment 1 _ ludo 2004-09-02 19:22:50 UTC
Adding J2EE_BLOCKER, since it will impact a lot our BluePrint
Integration Story.

I think the default project layout should always follow the blueprint
conventions.
Related to this, do we have a bug regarding the usage of Web
Application  instead of Web Module terminology and other blueprint
conventions that are not followed (i.e a war file name as to be lower
case,...)?

Do we know if RFEs can be fixed for NB4.0?
Comment 2 Petr Jiricka 2004-09-03 10:50:58 UTC
> Related to this, do we have a bug regarding ...

No we don't.

> Do we know if RFEs can be fixed for NB4.0?

If there is mutual agreement of all parties, then we can think of
addressing some specific RFEs. However, I don't think this one is
crucial for 4.0. There are other higher priority issues, such as issue
#48279.
Comment 3 Petr Jiricka 2004-12-14 18:31:05 UTC
Fixed by Andrei.