This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 47788 - AntArtifact should provide optional properties for target execution
Summary: AntArtifact should provide optional properties for target execution
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Ant Project (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: David Konecny
URL:
Keywords: API
Depends on: 51151 52886
Blocks: 41535
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2004-08-24 12:54 UTC by Adam Sotona
Modified: 2005-01-13 13:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Adam Sotona 2004-08-24 12:54:21 UTC 
This requirement was previously raised to satisfy
project J2ME dependencies when referencing some
project configuration.
Current workaround is to build all configurations
of library project when called from application
project.
New issue was raised on J2ME to do not always
build all configurations of all library projects
so the requirement to store additional properties
(property) together with AntArtifact is back.
Comment 1 Jesse Glick 2004-08-25 00:11:40 UTC 
It may now be too late for 4.0 (we are long past API freeze) unless
this is a serious requirement for 4.0. Is it?
Comment 2 Adam Sotona 2004-08-25 08:20:30 UTC 
It is not high priority issue now but we recieved just a little
feedback. Now it can be scheduled to 4.1 and escalated if some more
negative feedback comes.
Comment 3 Jesse Glick 2004-08-25 19:57:44 UTC 
OK, provisionally marking for E. I do not expect it would be difficult
to implement, it's just that we would need justification to make an
API change this late, I think.
Comment 4 David Konecny 2005-01-10 14:37:21 UTC 
Adam, could you please look at the issue 52886 which implements also
this one and let me know whether it fulfills your expectation. Please
look also at other changes planned there. Thanks.
Comment 5 David Konecny 2005-01-13 13:50:34 UTC 
Implemented as part of the issue 52886.