This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 47207 - Unable to deploy web application
Summary: Unable to deploy web application
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: serverplugins
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Infrastructure (show other bugs)
Version: 4.x
Hardware: All All
: P1 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Pavel Buzek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-13 14:02 UTC by Jan Horvath
Modified: 2006-03-24 10:03 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
javax.enterprise.deploy.spi.exceptions.ConfigurationException (28.50 KB, text/plain)
2004-08-13 14:03 UTC, Jan Horvath
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jan Horvath 2004-08-13 14:02:54 UTC
build 200408121800
specific on JDK 1.4.2 (1.5 works fine)

1. create Web Application
   -throws ConfigurationException on commandline
(see attachment)

2. run project
   -error in Deployment Progress Monitor:    
"Deployment error: Failed to lookup configuration
for Tomcat5 in MasterFileObject...."
Comment 1 Jan Horvath 2004-08-13 14:03:48 UTC
Created attachment 16806 [details]
javax.enterprise.deploy.spi.exceptions.ConfigurationException
Comment 2 Pavel Buzek 2004-08-16 05:30:53 UTC
This is a regression that happened recently. I will look into it ASAP.
Comment 3 Pavel Buzek 2004-08-16 22:12:34 UTC
I think I saw a similar exception several days ago but now I did
clean/update/build and cannot reproduce it. Is it 100% reproducible on
you machine (or other people's)? 
If not I can add some asserts in code to make it easier to track down
but I do not see where the problem is.

I am testing winxp with
1.4.2; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 1.4.2-b28; Sun Microsystems Inc.

I see platform/os say All/All. Is it not linux specific?
Thanks for any help.
Comment 4 Jan Horvath 2004-08-17 10:14:07 UTC
It is 100% reproducible on Solaris, Linux and WinXP with build
200407211800 and 200408121800. On build 200408151800 and later it
works fine.
Comment 5 Jan Horvath 2004-08-17 10:29:33 UTC
sorry there should be 200408111800 instead of 200407211800
Comment 6 Pavel Buzek 2004-08-17 16:43:37 UTC
thanks. If you see it again please reopen.
Comment 7 Jan Horvath 2005-04-18 13:26:21 UTC
v.