This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 32344 - icons lost after upgrade from Nb33
Summary: icons lost after upgrade from Nb33
Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 31208
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Explorer (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Rechtacek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-26 10:18 UTC by pzajac
Modified: 2008-12-22 21:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
png screenshot (40.50 KB, image/png)
2003-04-29 09:20 UTC, David Konecny
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description pzajac 2003-03-26 10:18:29 UTC
The explorer has empty icon after import from
Nb33. The icon rests empty after restart IDE,
close explorer,etc.
Comment 1 David Konecny 2003-03-26 10:28:52 UTC
Passing to Explorer for evaluation. Upgrade does not do anything
special what should caused that.
Comment 2 Jiri Rechtacek 2003-03-27 15:26:31 UTC
I don't think that is a concern of explorer/tree view. Here is a view
on stack trace of icon mining.

NodeRenderer$Tree.getTreeCellRendererComponent()
=> nodes.FilterNode.getIcon()
=> java.JavaNode.getIcon()
=> loaders.DataNode.getIcon()
=> nodes.AbstractNode.findIcon()
=> util.Utilities.loadIcon()

Maybe datasystems or nodes concernment. I'm returning it back to David.
Comment 3 David Konecny 2003-04-29 09:20:41 UTC
Created attachment 10181 [details]
png screenshot
Comment 4 David Konecny 2003-04-29 09:28:10 UTC
Jiri, I looked at it and the problem is that icon in the title of
Explorer window is missing. See the screenshot. So I would say that
problem is possible in definition of Explorer top component and
difference between NB33 and 35. It might be WinSys problem as well.

This is P5 issue which I suggest to evaluate only to learn what is the
cause of the problem and that there is no hidden serious issue with
larger impact. As for the fix, if it is not a few lines fix I would
not bother fixing this problem as it is really detail. 
Comment 5 David Konecny 2003-05-16 10:46:59 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 31208 ***
Comment 6 pzajac 2003-05-23 12:32:10 UTC
verified duplicate