This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 249155 - NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.LazyLookupProviders$1Prov$1.<init>
Summary: NullPointerException at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.LazyLookupProviders$1...
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Generic Infrastructure (show other bugs)
Version: 8.2
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Tomas Stupka
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-12-05 15:58 UTC by athompson
Modified: 2016-04-11 15:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 213936

Attachments
stacktrace (6.31 KB, text/plain)
2014-12-05 15:58 UTC, athompson 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description athompson 2014-12-05 15:58:32 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 201412040001)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 25.25-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.8.0_25-b17
OS: Mac OS X

User Comments:
athompson: expanded a folder in Favorites




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.NullPointerException
   at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.LazyLookupProviders$1Prov$1.<init>(LazyLookupProviders.java:90)
   at org.netbeans.modules.projectapi.LazyLookupProviders$1Prov.createAdditionalLookup(LazyLookupProviders.java:89)
   at org.netbeans.spi.project.support.DelegatingLookupImpl.doDelegate(DelegatingLookupImpl.java:139)
   at org.netbeans.spi.project.support.DelegatingLookupImpl.<init>(DelegatingLookupImpl.java:91)
   at org.netbeans.spi.project.support.LookupProviderSupport.createCompositeLookup(LookupProviderSupport.java:107)
   at org.netbeans.modules.maven.NbMavenProjectImpl.<init>(NbMavenProjectImpl.java:248)
Comment 1 athompson 2014-12-05 15:58:37 UTC 
Created attachment 150920 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Tomas Stupka 2016-04-06 10:20:45 UTC 
just one report and no duplicates in over a year. perhaps the problem is already gone. 
closing for now ...
Comment 3 athompson 2016-04-11 15:14:05 UTC 
Yup, haven't seen it.