Build: NetBeans IDE 7.4 Beta (Build 201307092200)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 23.25-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_25-b15
GUEST: Reverting modifications while scanning was taking place
powellblyth: Accidentally Cmd+A on the file tree, Didn't know it would do that. Does it need to?
GUEST: selecting 200+ file in favorites window.
jmichelberger: Selecting multiple nodes in Files view.
Maximum slowness yet reported was 24439 ms, average is 7049
Created attachment 139882 [details]
steps to reproduce:
1) open favorites and expand a folder with lots of files
2) wait until all nodes are loaded (all icons are correctly displayed)
3) Ctrl + A
From what we got while debugging:
- lookup is being built for all the nodes ProxyLookup$Result#1
- first node (when building its lookup) fires an event (for some reason its cookie set changes)
- the ProxyLookup$Result#1 catches the event and before passing it further it starts collecting all changes from all nodes again
- so it asks the second node which now fires another event => ProxyLookup$Result#1 again catches the event and recursively asks node after node again and again.
See the attached partial stacktrace, ProxyLookup$R is always the same instance, DataNode/DataObject instances are different in the stacktrace. Maybe ProxyLookup could be more clever and stop reacting on changes and recursively accessing all nodes when it's building?
Created attachment 143305 [details]
Created attachment 143306 [details]
Jardo, your patch helped after all and made it much much faster.
ergonomics#f143d26b5461 seems speed the selection up significantly. Hopefully it won't cause many test regressions and I will be able to propagate it to 8.0.
*** Bug 240901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Integrated into 'main-silver', will be available in build *201402170649* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
User: Jaroslav Tulach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Log: #235748: Limit the recursion from updateCookiesFromLookup
*** Bug 241548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 204645 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***