This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 233172 - IndexOutOfBoundsException: valid viewIndex: 0 <= index < 110 but was: 113
Summary: IndexOutOfBoundsException: valid viewIndex: 0 <= index < 110 but was: 113
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: db
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Show Data (show other bugs)
Version: 7.4
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Libor Fischmeistr
URL:
Keywords:
: 242996 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-07-22 12:15 UTC by bolsover
Modified: 2014-03-28 15:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 202375

Attachments
stacktrace (3.19 KB, text/plain)
2013-07-22 12:16 UTC, bolsover 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description bolsover 2013-07-22 12:15:59 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 7.4 Beta (Build 201307092200)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 23.25-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.7.0_25-b16
OS: Windows 7

User Comments:
bolsover: Deleted rows from database table




Stacktrace: 
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: valid viewIndex: 0 <= index < 110 but was: 113
   at org.jdesktop.swingx.sort.DefaultSortController.convertRowIndexToModel(DefaultSortController.java:311)
   at javax.swing.JTable.convertRowIndexToModel(JTable.java:2641)
   at org.netbeans.modules.db.dataview.table.ResultSetJXTable.isCellEditable(ResultSetJXTable.java:307)
   at org.jdesktop.swingx.JXTable.setValueAt(JXTable.java:1471)
   at javax.swing.JTable.editingStopped(JTable.java:4722)
   at javax.swing.AbstractCellEditor.fireEditingStopped(AbstractCellEditor.java:141)
Comment 1 bolsover 2013-07-22 12:16:01 UTC 
Created attachment 137553 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Libor Fischmeistr 2013-08-08 11:50:22 UTC 
Hello,

I would ask you for additional info. I cannot reproduce this bug.

Please tell me if you are able to reproduce it. And if yes then please describe more detailed steps to reproduce.

Thanks
Comment 3 bolsover 2013-08-09 11:38:49 UTC 
I've not been able to reproduce since this initial event.
Comment 4 Libor Fischmeistr 2013-08-20 08:51:25 UTC 
Unfortunately I have to close this issue as WORKSFORME

It would be great if you had steps to reproduce to be able to found the source of the problem.

Please, if this appear again, try to remember at least the original data (the count of lines) and the deleted lines. Then reopen.

Thanks
Comment 5 Libor Fischmeistr 2014-03-28 15:41:00 UTC 
*** Bug 242996 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***