This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 216426 - NetBeans crashed with SIGSEGV after running page in JavaFX browser
Summary: NetBeans crashed with SIGSEGV after running page in JavaFX browser
Status: VERIFIED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: JDK Problems (show other bugs)
Version: 7.2
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal (vote)
Assignee: Antonin Nebuzelsky
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-06 07:51 UTC by Vladimir Riha
Modified: 2012-09-07 08:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
jvm crash log (72.86 KB, text/x-log)
2012-08-06 07:51 UTC, Vladimir Riha 		Details
IDE log (244.16 KB, text/plain)
2012-08-06 07:52 UTC, Vladimir Riha 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Vladimir Riha 2012-08-06 07:51:44 UTC 
Created attachment 122766 [details]
jvm crash log

My HTML file (HTML/JavaScript project) was running in Chrome browser. After changing configuration to JavaFX browser and running the file again, NetBeans crashed 


  Product Version         = NetBeans IDE Dev (Build EaselCSS-441-on-20120805) (#0249af329ee6)
  Operating System        = Linux version 3.0.0-23-generic running on i386
  Java; VM; Vendor        = 1.7.0_06-ea; Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM 23.2-b09; Oracle Corporation
  Runtime                 = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.7.0_06-ea-b20

JavaFX version: 2.2.0 b20
Comment 1 Vladimir Riha 2012-08-06 07:52:00 UTC 
Created attachment 122768 [details]
IDE log
Comment 2 Stanislav Aubrecht 2012-08-15 10:30:47 UTC 
Reported as http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-24275
Comment 3 Stanislav Aubrecht 2012-08-15 10:57:47 UTC 
http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-24276
Comment 4 Stanislav Aubrecht 2012-09-07 07:44:07 UTC 
Cannot reproduce anymore.
Comment 5 Vladimir Riha 2012-09-07 08:07:10 UTC 
Thanks, I agree