This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 202324 - Need a way to provide a custom SourceFileInfoDataProvider to FunctionsListDataProvider
Summary: Need a way to provide a custom SourceFileInfoDataProvider to FunctionsListDat...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: cnd
Classification: Unclassified
Component: D-Light (show other bugs)
Version: 7.1
Hardware: PC Solaris
: P2 normal (vote)
Assignee: Andrew Krasny
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-09-19 17:01 UTC by Andrew Krasny
Modified: 2011-09-29 11:45 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
proposed patch (12.98 KB, patch)
2011-09-21 07:40 UTC, Andrew Krasny 		Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Krasny 2011-09-19 17:01:29 UTC 
Need a way to provide a custom SourceFileInfoDataProvider to FunctionsListDataProvider. 
This is needed to make FunctionsListViewVisualizer to work with functions from multiple contexts...
Comment 1 Andrew Krasny 2011-09-21 07:38:46 UTC 
proposed patch is attached.
Igor, please review...
Comment 2 Andrew Krasny 2011-09-21 07:40:20 UTC 
Created attachment 110943 [details]
proposed patch
Comment 3 igor_nikiforov 2011-09-21 08:07:21 UTC 
The patch looks save and can go to 7.0.1 patch 2.
Comment 4 Andrew Krasny 2011-09-21 08:13:52 UTC 
Pushed to releases_elif changeset: e162ffc04af1
Comment 5 Vladimir Voskresensky 2011-09-22 17:22:26 UTC 
SPI is in place and used by d-light
Comment 6 Quality Engineering 2011-09-26 13:30:40 UTC 
Integrated into 'releases'
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/rev/e162ffc04af1
User: Andrew Krasny <akrasny@netbeans.org>
Log: FIXED Bug #202324 Need a way to provide a custom SourceFileInfoDataProvider to FunctionsListDataProvider
Comment 7 Alexander Pepin 2011-09-29 11:45:04 UTC 
It does not need verification from QA