This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 193943 - [70cat] java.sql.SQLException: Can't drop database 'bertele_com16326'. Database doesn't exist
Summary: [70cat] java.sql.SQLException: Can't drop database 'bertele_com16326'. Databa...
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Alias: None
Product: db
Classification: Unclassified
Component: MySQL (show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All All
: P4 normal (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Rechtacek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-12-30 16:36 UTC by simpatico
Modified: 2013-06-15 21:07 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 175477

Attachments
stacktrace (1.34 KB, text/plain)
2010-12-30 16:36 UTC, simpatico 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description simpatico 2010-12-30 16:36:05 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 7.0 Beta (Build 201011152355)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 19.0-b09, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_23-b05
OS: Windows 7

Stacktrace: 
java.sql.SQLException: Can't drop database 'bertele_com16326'. Database doesn't exist
   at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:1075)
   at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:3566)
   at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:3498)
   at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:1959)
   at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:2113)
   at com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.execSQL(ConnectionImpl.java:2568)
Comment 1 simpatico 2010-12-30 16:36:09 UTC 
Created attachment 104633 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 matthias42 2013-06-15 21:07:20 UTC 
Without knowledge of the circumstances this might be a totally correct response.

The database might have been dropped outside of netbeans - in this case the db metadata is not automaticly updated (netbeeans woold need to constantly poll the database).

Please provide more info if you still consider this a bug - or give a description what you would expect as correct behaviour.