This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 191646 - difference between the content tab and the menu tab
Summary: difference between the content tab and the menu tab
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 226504
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Mercurial (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Windows 7
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Ondrej Vrabec
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-11-04 16:34 UTC by kstruk
Modified: 2013-03-21 08:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
svn menu.png (115.98 KB, image/png)
2010-11-04 19:35 UTC, kstruk
Details
hg menu.png (75.30 KB, image/png)
2010-11-04 19:36 UTC, kstruk
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description kstruk 2010-11-04 16:34:34 UTC
I can not understand something...
I am using svn at work, svn project context menu looks like the team svn menu.
Why the project context menu is very different from the team menu for mercurial?
Comment 1 Ondrej Vrabec 2010-11-04 17:00:03 UTC
Sorry, i don't understand at all what you mean. Could you be more specific? You could probably demonstrate  your problem with a screenshot.
The issue summary says something different from what you state in your comment. What differs? File's annotations in tabs (that's what i understood from the summary)? Or the actions in the context and main menu?
If the latter (the actions in menus), what does this has to do with svn?

Anyway, to your last question:
> Why the project context menu is very different from the team menu for mercurial?
Because:
1) there is not enough space to have all actions in the context menu
2) some actions from the main menu are related to the whole repository and it makes no sense to have them available also from the context menu on a file.

What are you missing in the context menu?

BTW, in subversion there are also several actions missing in the context menu.
Comment 2 kstruk 2010-11-04 19:35:49 UTC
Created attachment 102808 [details]
svn menu.png
Comment 3 kstruk 2010-11-04 19:36:15 UTC
Created attachment 102809 [details]
hg menu.png
Comment 4 kstruk 2010-11-04 20:20:07 UTC
//there is not enough space to have all actions in the context menu
I doubt that there is not enough space. svn has 16 actions, hg has only 7 actions.

//What are you missing in the context menu?

clone, merge, update, share

//BTW, in subversion there are also several actions missing in the context menu.
but they have everything you need in everyday use, and what can be done with hg context menu? commit, revert.. this is not enough.

over the past 2 years work in NB with svn, I've never used team menu. I did not think that there is a difference between them.

6 months ago, I began to use mercurial for some projects. looking to the context menu, I thought that the NB does not fully support it. I had to use the console. Recently happened to see a screenshot of the menu in the article about using mercurial in NB and realized that something I do not know.
Comment 5 Ondrej Vrabec 2010-11-04 20:52:12 UTC
clone? i don't think so, how many times a day do you run a hg clone?
merge, update - maybe, we'll consider it
share - already there (not sure if already in 6.9, but definitely in 7.0)
Comment 6 Ondrej Vrabec 2013-03-21 08:33:11 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 226504 ***