This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 175300 - com.sun.jdi.InternalException: Unexpected JDWP Error: 23
Summary: com.sun.jdi.InternalException: Unexpected JDWP Error: 23
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: debugger
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Java (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P4 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Entlicher
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-10-23 15:23 UTC by Egor Ushakov
Modified: 2010-05-06 11:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 71771

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Egor Ushakov 2009-10-23 15:23:44 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.8 Beta (Build 200910212001)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.1-b02, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_15-b03
OS: SunOS, 5.11, x86

User Comments:
GUEST: Java web application in debug mode. I applied F7 (step into) inside Java code.

anba: I added a new static method during debugging and the used Debug > Apply Code Changes for the changed class



Stacktrace: 
com.sun.jdi.InternalException: Unexpected JDWP Error: 23
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.JDWPException.toJDIException(JDWPException.java:47)
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.ReferenceTypeImpl.methods(ReferenceTypeImpl.java:452)
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.ReferenceTypeImpl.getMethodMirror(ReferenceTypeImpl.java:84)
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.LocationImpl.method(LocationImpl.java:85)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.jdi.LocationWrapper.method(LocationWrapper.java:214)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.models.CallStackFrameImpl.canPop(CallStackFrameImpl.java:686)
Comment 1 Martin Entlicher 2009-10-23 19:02:09 UTC 
Error: 23 means INVALID_METHODID. Apply Code Changes is unfortunately very buggy, you'll better not use it when you
really do not have to.
Comment 2 Martin Entlicher 2009-10-27 11:18:46 UTC 
Reducing to P4 - seems like a very rare JDK defect.
Comment 3 Martin Entlicher 2009-12-02 13:09:44 UTC 
JDK error => WONTFIX.