This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 171461 - MultiViewPeer.showCurrentElement() too long in AWT thread
Summary: MultiViewPeer.showCurrentElement() too long in AWT thread
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 160377
Alias: None
Product: guibuilder
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@guibuilder
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-09-04 10:25 UTC by Jiri Prox
Modified: 2009-10-07 15:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 157699


Attachments
nps snapshot (20.40 KB, bin/nps)
2009-09-22 13:08 UTC, Exceptions Reporter
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jiri Prox 2009-09-04 10:25:42 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200909011401)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.1-b02, Java(TM) Platform, Standard Edition for Business, 1.6.0_15-b03
OS: Linux, 2.6.24-23-generic, i386
User comments: Switching to Design view when working of form
Maximum slowness yet reported was 5453 ms, average is 4668
Comment 1 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-20 01:16:51 UTC
This issue already has 5 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157699
Comment 2 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-22 13:08:37 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200908022240)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 11.0-b16, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_11-b03
OS: Windows 2003, 5.2, x86

User Comments: 

Maximum slowness yet reported was 5516 ms, average is 4324
Comment 3 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-22 13:08:41 UTC
Created attachment 88100 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 4 Exceptions Reporter 2009-09-22 13:08:46 UTC
This issue already has 6 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=157699
Comment 5 Jan Stola 2009-10-07 15:08:45 UTC

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 160377 ***