This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 171089 - Table node refuses to expand
Summary: Table node refuses to expand
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 155977
Alias: None
Product: db
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Jiri Rechtacek
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-28 15:42 UTC by saltysnow
Modified: 2009-09-01 15:22 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:


Attachments
IDE log (41.49 KB, text/plain)
2009-09-01 14:40 UTC, saltysnow
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description saltysnow 2009-08-28 15:42:22 UTC
Connected to an oracle DB and was able to browse all tables in the tree before. Now one table in particular does not
expand. I click on the + sign and it shows the hour glass forever.

Driver: oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver
DB: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options

I may be worthwhile to know that this table has a very large amount of columns and that this worked in 6.5.
Comment 1 Jiri Rechtacek 2009-09-01 13:23:56 UTC
Could you please, add more details about the problem (e.g. IDE log, full name of Oracle JAR driver). Is this problem
reproducible with other DB? Thanks
Comment 2 saltysnow 2009-09-01 14:39:02 UTC
Driver jar ojdbc14-10.2.0.3.0.jar. Log attached. I don't have the resources to test this on another DB at this time, but
I've verified that the same schema on many different servers gives the same issue. Hope that helps. Thanks.
Comment 3 saltysnow 2009-09-01 14:40:11 UTC
Created attachment 86920 [details]
IDE log
Comment 4 Jiri Rechtacek 2009-09-01 15:22:37 UTC
Thanks for your information. The problem seems to be a duplicate of issue 155977, which was fixed 2009/07/16 for NB6.8.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 155977 ***