This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 160966 - com.sun.jdi.InvalidStackFrameException: Thread has been resumed
Summary: com.sun.jdi.InvalidStackFrameException: Thread has been resumed
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: debugger
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Java (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Martin Entlicher
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on: 161270
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-03-24 01:57 UTC by arnex
Modified: 2009-07-13 18:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 120232


Attachments
stacktrace (933 bytes, text/plain)
2009-03-24 01:57 UTC, arnex
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description arnex 2009-03-24 01:57:27 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.5 (Build 200811100001)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 10.0-b23, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_07-b06
OS: Windows 2000, 5.0, x86

User Comments:
rmichalsky: Debugging with conditional breakpoint

GUEST: When using run to line while debugging JSP

GUEST: Debbuging while having a brakpoint in a recursive method, having a condition set



Stacktrace: 
com.sun.jdi.InvalidStackFrameException: Thread has been resumed
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.StackFrameImpl.validateStackFrame(StackFrameImpl.java:62)
        at com.sun.tools.jdi.StackFrameImpl.thread(StackFrameImpl.java:80)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.JPDADebuggerImpl.evaluateIn(JPDADebuggerImpl.java:734)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.breakpoints.BreakpointImpl.evaluateConditionIn(BreakpointImpl.java:677)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.breakpoints.BreakpointImpl.evaluateCondition(BreakpointImpl.java:563)
        at org.netbeans.modules.debugger.jpda.breakpoints.BreakpointImpl.processCondition(BreakpointImpl.java:329)
Comment 1 arnex 2009-03-24 01:57:32 UTC
Created attachment 78712 [details]
stacktrace
Comment 2 Martin Entlicher 2009-07-07 15:49:38 UTC
This should be fixed after http://hg.netbeans.org/main/rev/ee23e0e1b5a6 and http://hg.netbeans.org/main/rev/b8f16f4a60fa.