This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 155012 - com.sun.tools.javac.util.FatalError: Fatal Error: Unable to find method byteValue
Summary: com.sun.tools.javac.util.FatalError: Fatal Error: Unable to find method byteV...
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 151422
Alias: None
Product: java
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Compiler (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Dusan Balek
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/except...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-12-09 10:20 UTC by Marian Mirilovic
Modified: 2009-02-19 21:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 90660

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marian Mirilovic 2008-12-09 10:20:40 UTC 
16 duplicates so far ...

Build: NetBeans IDE 6.5 Beta (Build 200808111757)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 10.0-b23, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_07-b06
OS: Windows XP, 5.1, x86
User comments: 
STACKTRACE: (first 10 lines)
com.sun.tools.javac.util.FatalError: Fatal Error: Unable to find method byteValue
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Resolve.resolveInternalMethod(Resolve.java:1270)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.lookupMethod(Lower.java:640)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.unbox(Lower.java:2620)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.boxIfNeeded(Lower.java:2581)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translate(Lower.java:1928)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.visitBinary(Lower.java:2808)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.tree.JCTree$JCBinary.accept(JCTree.java:1543)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.tree.TreeTranslator.translate(TreeTranslator.java:58)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translate(Lower.java:1916)
        at com.sun.tools.javac.comp.Lower.translate(Lower.java:1928)
Comment 1 Dusan Balek 2009-01-06 14:00:27 UTC 
The same problem as described in #151422.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 151422 ***
Comment 2 Marian Mirilovic 2009-01-08 11:17:03 UTC 
v/c