This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
All the editors i've checked (xml, java, css) has too much empty space wasted between lines. Changing the font from default ("Monospaced 13") to something else, doesn't change this spacing issue. A picture is worth a thousand words etc... so I'll attach a few to demonstrate (if I can find how to do it in this issue tracking system) I use Ubuntu 8.10 with OpenJDK 6 provided in Ubuntu. //Finn Johnsen
Created attachment 73975 [details] Start Page
Created attachment 73976 [details] Start Page
Created attachment 73977 [details] html -editor
Created attachment 73978 [details] java -editor
My Ubuntu is as good as out of the box, freshly installed when 8.10 came out less than a month ago. But I forgot to mention, I'm using 64 bit. ~$ uname -a Linux MYHOSTNAME 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP Tue Nov 4 19:33:06 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux Please let me know if there is any more information I should provide.
Someone please delete attachment id=73975, I specified incorrect mime.
As I wrote in the mailing list [1], the workaround is simple on Ubuntu - install Sun's official JDK by typing (in console): $ sudo apt-get install sun-java6-jdk $ sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun It is free, it has no special disadvantages, you don't need to register, nothing... Then you can either edit path to jdk in "<nb_install_dir>/etc/netbeans.conf" or you can launch IDE specifying JDK path explicitly: $ ./netbeans --jdkhome /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-jdk I believe we cannot do much on our side, as the problem is in OpenJDK. I am sorry, closing as WONTFIX, not a NetBeans issue. [1] http://www.nabble.com/Editor-text-wasting-vertical-space-to20606100.html
Thanks a bunch! btw, this is the correct path to use as jdkhome after installing the sun jdk: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun
Oh, you are right - I made lame mistake (...funny I wrote it correctly few lines above...).
*** Issue 166516 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***