This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Though dependency on apisupport cluster is not specified in cluster.properties for mobility cluster, mobility cluster needs org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project from apisupport cluster and so it depends on apisupport cluster and cannot be built without it. Used sources: http://download.netbeans.org/netbeans/6.5/rc/zip/netbeans-6.5rc1-200810171318-src.zip Build command (from Gentoo ebuild): eant '-Dstop.when.broken.modules=true' '-Dbuild.compiler.deprecation=false' '-Dnb.clusters.list=nb.cluster.platform,nb.cluster.nb,nb.cluster.groovy,nb.cluster.gsf,nb.cluster.harness,nb.cluster.ide,nb.cluster.j2ee,nb.cluster.java,nb.cluster.mobility,nb.cluster.websvccommon' '-f' 'nbbuild/build.xml' 'build-nozip' Error output: build-init: [nbmerge] Failed to build target: all-vmd.componentssupport BUILD FAILED /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/netbeans-6.5_rc1/work/nbbuild/build.xml:713: The following error occurred while executing this line: /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/netbeans-6.5_rc1/work/nbbuild/build.xml:708: The following error occurred while executing this line: /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/netbeans-6.5_rc1/work/nbbuild/build.xml:754: The following error occurred while executing this line: /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/netbeans-6.5_rc1/work/nbbuild/templates/projectized.xml:87: No dependent module org.netbeans.modules.apisupport.project
Jesse, could you comment on this? Also decreasing to P4 as it is not runtime issue
Making mobility dep on apisupport seems undesirable, and making a new cluster just for this one module seems wrong. Probably the first option is the only viable solution: fix the cluster dependencies. In general, using the cluster as a unit of work for the build is problematic. See similar issue #145198. Not a runtime problem, but mistakes in our build system delay the work of packagers, and that hurts adoption of our product.
When do you expect we can fix this Jesse?
What do you mean? You can fix it any day you like. It's a one-line change in cluster.properties.
Maybe fixed in 05dc74434a40?
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 158064 ***
No, that is about the dep on the enterprise cluster. This is a dep on apisupport.
Again, I believe fixed in 05dc74434a40.