This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 148795 - I18N - jsf sample projects don't have descriptive name
Summary: I18N - jsf sample projects don't have descriptive name
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: javaee
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Code (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: Sun All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: Dongmei Cao
URL:
Keywords: I18N
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-01 00:33 UTC by Ken Frank
Modified: 2009-02-19 20:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ken Frank 2008-10-01 00:33:39 UTC 
in the new project wizard for the 3 jsf sample projects from web samjple category,
the words are not descriptive like for other projects.

this really isn't just i18n issue since am guessing it would be wanted even for english.
(then words could come from bundle file also and be able to be translated)
Comment 1 _ potingwu 2008-10-01 17:13:39 UTC 
These 3 samples are coming from JPA instead of JSF; WebJpa, JsfJpa, and JsfJpaCrud. The source codes are under
j2ee.samples/samples_src/{WebJpa,JsfJpa,JsfJpaCrud}.
Comment 2 Dongmei Cao 2008-10-02 18:41:29 UTC 
Can you give some suggestion on what the wording should be? Thanks.
Comment 3 Ken Frank 2008-10-02 18:45:48 UTC 
don't know if you are asking me (Ken) - if so I'd like to defer to developers
of these areas or the writers.

ken.frank@sun.com
Comment 4 Ken Frank 2008-10-31 00:33:12 UTC 
changing to p2 since it was my mistake in filing original issue

However, since this applies to english also, and is not really only i18n,
if team feels its required or really a p3, please close or change back to p3

PS if it is still to be open, should it be something fixed in first patch ?

ken.frank@sun.com
Comment 5 Dongmei Cao 2008-11-01 00:48:58 UTC 
I think it is a P3. Can be fixed in the next release.
Comment 6 Dongmei Cao 2008-11-18 20:07:59 UTC 
From developer point of view, the descriptions look just fine. 
Ken(kganfield), what do you think?
Comment 7 Kenneth Ganfield 2008-12-03 15:13:35 UTC 
i think the descriptions for WebJpa, JsfJpa, and JsfJpaCrud in the project wizard are OK.
If someone has a specific suggestion on how to improve them we could reevaluate, but i think we can close the issue
Comment 8 Dongmei Cao 2008-12-03 22:47:41 UTC 
Close it as "WORKSFORME". Ken(kfrank), please reopen the bug if you have specific suggestions on the wording.