This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 144351 - Mapping from Java to JavaFX variables needed for Profiler and Debugger
Summary: Mapping from Java to JavaFX variables needed for Profiler and Debugger
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: javafx
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Unsupported (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P2 blocker (vote)
Assignee: J Bachorik
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 135676
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-08-19 10:14 UTC by Alexey Butenko
Modified: 2011-05-16 13:48 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: TASK
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexey Butenko 2008-08-19 10:14:23 UTC 
Some mapping from Java to JavaFX variables needed for Debugger and Profiler.
Comment 1 David Strupl 2008-08-19 10:20:06 UTC 
Alexei, I guess we need this also for function names, right?

One more question: do we need the direction <Java Name> --> <FX Name>? Do we also need the opposite direction?
Comment 2 David Strupl 2008-08-19 10:21:35 UTC 
One more thing: can you suggest where we should put this? JavaFX Source module, some utitility class? Can you suggest
the method signatures?
Comment 3 Alexey Butenko 2008-08-19 10:31:35 UTC 
Yes, for function names also.
Direction is <Java> --> <JavaFX>, opposite direction probably doesn't needed, but may be Michael will correct me.
For the rest questions I'll think about usage example, for better understanding how we should use.
Comment 4 Alexey Butenko 2008-08-19 11:03:40 UTC 
wrong cc specified
Comment 5 cms 2008-08-19 11:27:17 UTC 
Agreed with Alexey, we don't need <FX>-<Java> mapping. 

I'm not sure how to handle situation (I believe very often) when different functions of one FX code generate more than
one instances of the same Java classes (for instance, widgets). 

Any suggestions how the mapping should be organized in this case? Simple names mapping won't help.
Comment 6 David Strupl 2008-10-29 14:25:56 UTC 
Post 1.0 feature.
Comment 7 Anton Chechel 2009-07-21 10:52:37 UTC 
Reassigning to profiler team.
Comment 8 David Strupl 2011-05-16 13:48:17 UTC 
Closing all bugs filed against JavaFX 1.x as wontfix. We will support JavaFX 2.0 - please keep opened only bugs against the new release. Thanks.