This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 137403 - "call graph" and "call hierarchy" windows should be integrated
Summary: "call graph" and "call hierarchy" windows should be integrated
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: ide
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: issues@ide
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 200111
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-06-17 10:04 UTC by Ondrej Langr
Modified: 2012-05-30 10:31 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ondrej Langr 2008-06-17 10:04:39 UTC 
If I understand correctly, the new call hierarchy and call graph windows serve from users' point of view essentially the
same purpose, call graph for C/C++ projects and call hierarchy for Java projects. 

Therefore, these two windows should be integrated.
Comment 1 Alexander Simon 2008-06-18 09:08:51 UTC 
Link on C/C++ call graph feature issue:
http://cnd.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109619
URL on feature description:
http://wiki.netbeans.org/CNDCallGraph
Comment 2 Ondrej Langr 2009-03-30 15:58:32 UTC 
Changing to DEFECT. 

"I" in the IDE stands for "integrated" :-). This does not seem to be very integrated, just the opposite. Requires users
exploring and learning their IDE to come across and understand more windows than necessary.
Comment 3 Quality Engineering 2009-03-31 19:54:04 UTC 
Integrated into 'main-golden', will be available in build *200903311400* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress)
Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/rev/a65ee8a7632d
User: Jan Pokorsky <jpokorsky@netbeans.org>
Log: #137403: delegating to JTable's default renderers rather than rely on UIManager defaults
Comment 4 Jan Pokorsky 2009-04-01 10:55:42 UTC 
Sorry, the integration mentioned above belongs to issue #161454.
Comment 5 Marian Mirilovic 2012-05-30 10:16:46 UTC 
No plans to do it