This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 12045 - DataShadow's Node should have property to change the original object
Summary: DataShadow's Node should have property to change the original object
Status: VERIFIED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: platform
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Data Systems (show other bugs)
Version: 3.x
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 blocker (vote)
Assignee: David Konecny
URL: http://www.netbeans.org/www-nbdev/msg...
Keywords:
Depends on: 12048
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2001-05-09 16:54 UTC by Jaroslav Tulach
Modified: 2008-12-22 23:39 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Exception Reporter:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jaroslav Tulach 2001-05-09 16:54:54 UTC 
David Strupl has implemented a property editor for DataObject. It would be nice
if it was used in DataShadow.ShadowNode. Please create read/write property that
will allow to change the original.
Comment 1 Vitezslav Stejskal 2001-09-21 12:49:44 UTC 
Moved to data systems.
Comment 2 Jan Chalupa 2001-11-27 13:02:14 UTC 
Target milestone -> 3.3.1.
Comment 3 Vitezslav Stejskal 2002-02-21 15:44:13 UTC 
giving up, reassigning to Petr
Comment 4 Marek Grummich 2002-07-22 11:25:06 UTC 
Set target milestone to TBD
Comment 5 Marek Grummich 2002-07-22 11:27:47 UTC 
Set target milestone to TBD
Comment 6 Marian Mirilovic 2003-03-13 13:42:28 UTC 
Changed owner David S. -> David K.
Comment 7 David Konecny 2003-04-30 15:38:41 UTC 
Changing TM to FUTURE for several DataSystem enhancements. The DS are planned
for rewrite and so it does not make sense to invest time into these
enhancements. If you think the issue is important and should be fixed for 4.0
then feel free to let me know. I'm open to change the plan.
Comment 8 Jesse Glick 2004-09-07 20:16:43 UTC 
This is just useless.
Comment 9 Marian Mirilovic 2005-12-20 16:04:08 UTC 
This issue was solved long time ago. Because nobody has reopened it neither
added comments, we are verifying/closing it now. 
If you are still able to reproduce the problem, please reopen. 

Thanks in advance.