This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 89438

Summary: Data sources alignment of NetBeans + VWP
Product: javaee Reporter: Petr Jiricka <pjiricka>
Component: CodeAssignee: John Baker <jbaker>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: blocker CC: davidvc, jimdavidson
Priority: P2 Keywords: UI, UMBRELLA
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://wiki.netbeans.info/wiki/view/VWPDataSourceIntegration
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT Exception Reporter:
Bug Depends on: 90209, 93159, 93216, 93805, 93815, 98376, 99610, 104444    
Bug Blocks: 90450, 89772    

Description Petr Jiricka 2006-11-16 09:59:04 UTC
Align the approaches that NetBeans and Creator take wrt. data source handling.
The combined solution should have the better of both worlds.
Comment 1 John Baker 2007-02-09 05:54:33 UTC
For this umbrella task, I should own. Subtasks are owned by others
Comment 2 John Baker 2007-02-28 22:47:19 UTC
Note: a couple of issues (see list) that make up this umbrella task will be
completed in M9.  The major tasks are to be completed in M8
Comment 3 John Baker 2007-03-27 03:29:42 UTC
90264 is not a dependent task
Comment 4 John Baker 2007-03-27 04:00:33 UTC
Since some tasks that were previously scheduled for M8 were pushed out to M9,
some dependent tasks to be completed in M10

Note, task 93216 was completed for M8
Comment 5 John Baker 2007-03-28 21:30:52 UTC
accidently removed 93216 as a dependency
Comment 6 John Baker 2007-03-30 05:18:43 UTC
87600 and 80210 should not be dependencies
Comment 7 John Baker 2007-05-03 21:19:05 UTC
90207 is no longer a dependency
Comment 8 John Baker 2007-06-17 21:48:54 UTC
The only remaining issue opened is 93805, which is for tracking the UI review the Data sources alignment and need to
know its status.  I had asked for status a couple of times, but no response yet.

Other issues have been integrated/resolved.
Comment 9 John Baker 2007-06-18 19:14:04 UTC
The last issue to resolve is 93805.
I marked 93805 as invalid since no UI review is needed.
Also, I sent an email to the submitter of 93805.