This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Deleting mulitple nodes fails in column view | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xml | Reporter: | Nathan Fiedler <nlfiedler> |
Component: | Schema Tools | Assignee: | Ayub Khan <ayubskhan> |
Status: | VERIFIED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | blocker | ||
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 5.x | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
Nathan Fiedler
2006-08-28 18:17:48 UTC
I just noticed this is not always reproducable (on Windows, may still happen all the time on Solaris, where I originally noticed the problem). It seems to fail the first time, but subsequent attempts to delete multiple nodes are successful. Nathan, It works fine for me on solaris 9 jdk 1.5.0_07. Can you retest? closing not reproducible. It must be specific to either Solaris 10, Solaris x86, or GNOME. The problem still occurs for me on Solaris 10 x86 using the GNOME desktop. Also, my comment about the problem disappearing after the first attempt is incorrect -- deleting multiple components never works as expected, in the column view mode. Tree view mode is okay. This issue probably happens only on Solaris 10, Solaris x86, or GNOME. Workarounds for user Multi select and use delete key single select and use context menu delete use tree editor FYI, I just reproduced this problem using a local build from today, on my Windows XP machine. So this is indeed _not_ specific to Solaris or Unix. The problem is, it is not always reproducable. Also reproducible in the latest CB 060926_10 on Solaris 9 sparc & Linux FC3 with jdk1.5.0_09. Added to RNs. Use the following link to review the wording and location of the issue in the staged Release Notes http://nbstaging.czech/community/releases/55/entpack_relnotes.html#83610 I could not reproduce the issue in Windows XP (nb release551 locally build) and JDK 1.6.0_b2. In my opinion this should be a P4 bug, and possible RN target. 99901 is a similar issue for current (6.0) version. So this issue should be closed anyway, and I mark it as verified. |