This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Request for new Wizard API review | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | platform | Reporter: | Jiri Rechtacek <jrechtacek> |
Component: | Dialogs&Wizards | Assignee: | Jiri Rechtacek <jrechtacek> |
Status: | VERIFIED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | blocker | CC: | mmetelka, pbuzek, phrebejk, pjiricka |
Priority: | P3 | Keywords: | API_REVIEW |
Version: | 3.x | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://openide.netbeans.org/proposals/wizards/index.html | ||
Issue Type: | TASK | Exception Reporter: |
Description
Jiri Rechtacek
2003-10-14 16:33:43 UTC
The only thing I am missing is a summary of issues that depend on the new Wizards framework. 26552 does not have any issues depending on it, does it mean there are no dependencies or they are on subtasks? Based on the review process this issue qualifies for the standard review: http://openide.netbeans.org/tutorial/review-steps.html Please complete answers for the arc questions: http://openide.netbeans.org/tutorial/questions.html and reassign back to me. The pre-review questions are answered at http://www.netbeans.org/source/browse/openide/arch/arch-openide-wizards.xml. Also you can checkout openide/wizards module from wizard_36584 branch and generate javadoc. The issue with dependences will be attached soon. Issue 26552 has now the bunch of enhancements/tasks depend on this umbrella issue. I assign back to Pavel. reassigning to reviewers, Jarda is the owner (responsible for holding the meeting and summarizing results), Petr J, Mila and Hrebejk are reviewers. I am setting 11/7 as target date. You can have the review whenever you want (just in PRG). Review document is here: http://openide.netbeans.org/tutorial/reviews/opinions_36584.html No changes planned to 3.6. Making the state to match the result of the review. This issue was solved long time ago. Because nobody has reopened it neither added comments, we are verifying/closing it now. If you are still able to reproduce the problem, please reopen. Thanks in advance. |