This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | Code completion does not insert specialized types | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | cnd | Reporter: | Alexander Simon <alexvsimon> |
Component: | Code Completion | Assignee: | Alexander Simon <alexvsimon> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | REGRESSION |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | Dev | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Solaris | ||
Issue Type: | DEFECT | Exception Reporter: |
Description
Alexander Simon
2016-10-27 12:28:00 UTC
It seems regression was introduced while fixing bug #268487 I think we should just not list specializations in the completion list. I think this issue should be fixed via not listing specializations in the completion list. (In reply to Vladimir Kvashin from comment #2) > I think we should just not list specializations in the completion list. > I think this issue should be fixed via not listing specializations in the > completion list. Why? IMHO it is a valuable feature to insert specialized template. In my example in most cases user want to inset exactly listed specialization of atomic (i.e. atomic<bool> or atomic<int>). Why user need to type "bool" or "int"? I agree. Full specializations worth to insert with specialized params to eleminate extra typing fixed in enum, branch release82, change set 87a170f4fd7f Integrated into 'main-silver', will be available in build *201612030001* on http://bits.netbeans.org/dev/nightly/ (upload may still be in progress) Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-silver/rev/82fa89004242 User: Alexander Simon <alexvsimon@netbeans.org> Log: fixed Bug #268711 Code completion does not insert specialized types (transplanted from 87a170f4fd7f9e5f5483d03b3f9346a1184adc88) Verified in internal NetBeans 8,2 patch 1 build. |