This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.
Summary: | JavaFX Platform autodetection mixes 32 and 64 bit kits | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | javafx | Reporter: | Stepan Zebra <stezeb> |
Component: | Platform | Assignee: | Petr Somol <psomol> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | askirov, dstrupl, psomol |
Priority: | P3 | ||
Version: | 7.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Issue Type: | TASK | Exception Reporter: | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 199283 |
Description
Stepan Zebra
2011-09-15 08:52:16 UTC
*** Bug 202166 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** fixed, but still need to check Mac OS lib name and uncomment Utils:217 http://hg.netbeans.org/jet-main/rev/a95e8f4645bf Integrated into 'main-golden' Changeset: http://hg.netbeans.org/main-golden/rev/a95e8f4645bf User: Anton Chechel <manowar@netbeans.org> Log: #202165: JavaFX Platform autodetection mixes 32 and 64 bit runtimes Reopening because of fix of http://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202328 There is no good way to detect architecture of JavaFX SDK until they provide us some info explicitly. Setting: - Target Milestone to Next - Priority to P3 *** Bug 202315 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 202750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** FX SDK should provide us this info. depends on http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-17796 (In reply to comment #8) > depends on > http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-17796 Issue was marked as resolved in FX 2.0.2. Any update? This issue becomes irrelevant from NetBeans 7.4 onwards, as NB7.4 does not allow arbitrary mixing of FX SDKs with JDKs; now only the FX distributed as part of JDK is supported. Accordingly, there is no auto-detection, except of auto-detection inside current JDK distribution. This is made possible by the fact that FX is always distributed as part of JDK since JDK 7u6. For more info see Issue #229678. |