This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 175233

Summary:	4s - editor.settings.storage.StorageImpl.load()
Product:	editor	Reporter:	Michel Graciano <hmichel>
Component:	Settings	Assignee:	Milutin Kristofic <mkristofic>
Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX
Severity:	blocker	CC:	adben, aldobrucale, andreyv, aquaglia, azizur, biermi, bmaunde, brunovernay, edjon2000, fdisk, gleyverg, hmichel, ihsahn, jdbevan, jmichelberger, jsedek, juniorsatanas, KhArtNJava, kolen, kosmonaffft, malfunction84, michbarsinai, mklaehn, muellermi, neonkowy, nysander, pinheirolouco, rescott2, ringerc, roger_rf, stefan79, szmitek, vandru, williambacchi, yardus, zolta
Priority:	P3
Version:	6.x
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=158187
Issue Type:	DEFECT	Exception Reporter:	158187
Attachments:	nps snapshot

Description Michel Graciano 2009-10-22 18:32:36 UTC

Build: NetBeans IDE Dev (Build 200910170201)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 14.2-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_16-b01
OS: Linux, 2.6.28-16-generic, i386
User comments: 
Maximum slowness yet reported was 20391 ms, average is 10304

Comment 1 Stanislav Aubrecht 2009-10-23 07:15:39 UTC

org.netbeans.ProxyClassLoader.loadClass() is slow

Comment 2 pansapien 2009-11-16 11:25:36 UTC

Created attachment 91117 [details]
nps snapshot

Comment 3 Exceptions Reporter 2009-11-16 11:25:43 UTC

This issue already has 7 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=158187

Comment 4 Exceptions Reporter 2009-11-18 05:14:20 UTC

This issue already has 9 duplicates 
see http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=158187

Comment 5 Jaroslav Tulach 2011-04-13 13:31:34 UTC

The snapshot:
http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/exception.do?id=500814
shows that org.netbeans.modules.editor.settings.storage.StorageImpl.load() is blocked by long running save (which includes also compilation of XSL scripts). The  critical section in save could be made smaller, I am sure.

Comment 6 Milutin Kristofic 2011-09-19 15:21:47 UTC

*** Bug 192182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Milutin Kristofic 2011-09-19 15:27:04 UTC

*** Bug 195539 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Milutin Kristofic 2013-07-30 13:46:29 UTC

They are many irrelevant snapshots in this issue. There is no plan to make StorageImpl.save faster, since it is sufficently fast and improvement has not good ratio of effort/benefit.