This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 143668

Summary: IllegalArgumentException: Error generated in parsing
Product: obsolete Reporter: Lukas Hasik <lhasik>
Component: RegistrationAssignee: mslama <mslama>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: blocker CC: kzmuhia
Priority: P3    
Version: 6.x   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
URL: http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/detail.do?id=28271
Issue Type: DEFECT Exception Reporter: 28271

Description Lukas Hasik 2008-08-12 19:45:55 UTC
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.0.1 (Build 200801291616)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM, 10.0-b19
OS: Linux, 2.6.22-14-generic, i386
User comments: 
STACKTRACE: (first 10 lines)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error generated in parsing
        at org.netbeans.modules.reglib.StatusDocument.initializeDocument(StatusDocument.java:187)
        at org.netbeans.modules.reglib.StatusDocument.load(StatusDocument.java:97)
        at org.netbeans.modules.reglib.StatusData.loadFromXML(StatusData.java:121)
        at org.netbeans.modules.registration.NbConnection.checkStatus(NbConnection.java:135)
        at org.netbeans.modules.registration.NbConnection.access$000(NbConnection.java:90)
        at org.netbeans.modules.registration.NbConnection$1$1$1.run(NbConnection.java:115)
        at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:209)
        at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:597)
        at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:273)
        at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:183)
Comment 1 mslama 2008-08-13 14:17:45 UTC
Is it possible to see ide log from previous run? Usually it happens when xml file to be parsed is empty ie. when it is
not saved during previous ide run. We had this problem before when there was old xml parser jar added on class path.
Comment 2 mslama 2008-08-13 14:30:05 UTC
The same issue was #127252 so probably duplicate.

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 127252 ***