Return-path: Received: from d1-emea-09.sun.com ([192.18.2.119]) by nedge1-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J6200LK8D81L2F0@nedge1-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> for Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 14:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.d1-emea-09.sun.com by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) id <0J6200701D56G400@d1-emea-09.sun.com> (original mail from Radko.Najman@Sun.COM) for Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM (ORCPT Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:04:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from [129.150.116.56] by d1-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0J6200DIFD80E9S5@d1-emea-09.sun.com> for Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM (ORCPT Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:04:49 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:04:46 +0200 From: Radko Najman Subject: Re: another review request In-reply-to: <451408DF.6000801@sun.com> Sender: Radko.Najman@Sun.COM To: vince kraemer Message-id: <4515A16E.7030503@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <451408DF.6000801@sun.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-recipient: rfc822;Vince.Kraemer@Sun.COM Hi Vince, I'm just leaving for my vacation and at last moment I mentioned your review request. I quickly reviewed it and I think it is OK. My comment from my previous review was addressed so I agree with it. I don't have enough time to test it so before commiting it into release55 branch please make sure that it will not affect older projects. I mean that projects created with previous NetBeans versions without this new property will still work fine. Thanks, Radko vince kraemer wrote: > Radko, > > I hate to burden you with this, since you already did the review > earlier, but the API change that you recommended moved the commit for > 83520 into the HR timeframe. > > Would you be willing to review the diffs attached to > http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84544 and > http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=83520? > > The diff attached to 84544 is the api changes. > > The diffs attached to 83520 resolve the issue (but are dependent on the > api change). > > Thanks, > vbk