This Bugzilla instance is a read-only archive of historic NetBeans bug reports. To report a bug in NetBeans please follow the project's instructions for reporting issues.

Bug 185414 - LowPerformance took 3577 ms.
Summary: LowPerformance took 3577 ms.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: versioncontrol
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Mercurial (show other bugs)
Version: 6.x
Hardware: All All
: P3 normal (vote)
Assignee: Tomas Stupka
URL:
Keywords: PERFORMANCE
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-05-04 08:56 UTC by andreyv
Modified: 2011-11-18 13:03 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: DEFECT
Exception Reporter: 164090

Attachments
nps snapshot (9.77 KB, application/nps)
2010-05-04 08:56 UTC, andreyv 		Details
patch for subversion (7.91 KB, patch)
2010-05-14 12:39 UTC, Tomas Stupka 		Details | Diff
nps snapshot (12.39 KB, application/nps)
2010-05-19 12:02 UTC, andreyv 		Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description andreyv 2010-05-04 08:56:42 UTC 
Build: NetBeans IDE 6.9 Beta (Build 201004200117)
VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 16.3-b01, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment, 1.6.0_20-b02
OS: Linux
Maximum slowness yet reported was 17863 ms, average is 8877
Comment 1 andreyv 2010-05-04 08:56:47 UTC 
Created attachment 98416 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 2 Tomas Stupka 2010-05-14 12:37:59 UTC 
the same in subversion
Comment 3 Tomas Stupka 2010-05-14 12:39:17 UTC 
Created attachment 99003 [details]
patch for subversion
Comment 4 andreyv 2010-05-19 12:02:02 UTC 
Created attachment 99197 [details]
nps snapshot
Comment 5 Tomas Stupka 2010-06-02 09:08:32 UTC 
fixed in hg and svn
#1f2e4bcaf9ac
Comment 6 Petr Jiricka 2011-11-18 12:59:34 UTC 
I got this again in the latest build: http://statistics.netbeans.org/exceptions/exception.do?id=544062

Has this reappeared, or is that a different problem?
Comment 7 Ondrej Vrabec 2011-11-18 13:03:43 UTC 
> Has this reappeared, or is that a different problem?
It's duplicate of this one: bug #191338